What is the purpose of section 174A of the Corporation Tax Act 2010?

Section 174A exempts standard protective provisions commonly found in joint venture shareholders' agreements from the option arrangement rules in section 173. Without this exemption, routine commercial clauses dealing with insolvency, breach, or departure could inadvertently affect equity holder status and disrupt group relief claims under United Kingdom corporation tax law.

What qualifying contingencies are covered by the section 174A exemption?

The qualifying contingencies include a member's voluntary departure, commencement of insolvency proceedings, serious deterioration in financial condition, change of control, default on obligations, external commercial threats to the joint venture's viability, and unresolved disagreements between members. Any similar contingency not intended to occur when arrangements were made also qualifies.

When does the section 174A exemption cease to apply?

The exemption operates only for as long as none of the specified contingencies has actually occurred. Once a qualifying contingency takes place, the protective arrangements may then fall to be treated as option arrangements under section 173 in the normal way, potentially affecting equity holder status and group relief availability.

What anti-avoidance safeguard exists within section 174A?

The exemption is unavailable if any member, alone or together with connected persons, could dictate the terms or timing of the share transfer or voting rights suspension before a contingency actually occurs. However, members are not treated as connected solely because they are co-members of the joint venture company under section 1122.

Corporation Tax Act 2010 section 174A

Certain option arrangements not within section 173

Section 174A provides an exemption from the option arrangement rules in section 173 for certain standard protective provisions commonly found in joint venture agreements, so long as no triggering event has actually occurred.

Standard joint venture agreements that provide for share transfers or suspension of voting rights upon specified contingencies are not treated as option arrangements under section 173, provided none of those contingencies has yet occurred.
The qualifying contingencies include a member's voluntary departure, insolvency, serious financial deterioration, change of control, breach of obligations, external commercial threats to the joint venture's viability, and unresolved disagreements between members.
The exemption does not apply if any member, alone or together with connected persons, could dictate the terms or timing of the share transfer or voting rights suspension before a contingency actually occurs.
A joint venture company is defined as one with two or more member companies carrying on a commercial activity governed by an agreement regulating the members' affairs, and mere co-membership of the joint venture does not make members connected with each other.

Access full legislation.And much more.

By becoming a member, your team gets full access to Tax World research tools and source-backed tax resources.

Become a member